AUSSDA

Metrics

173,843 Downloads

Find data, share data, and cite data with confidence.

Get started! Sign in with your institutional account to get fast and easy access to most of our datasets and accompanying documentation. Search for datasets by entering topics you are interested in into the search bar. Discover collections in Dataverses directly below. FAQ & Downloads.

Public

AUTNES

Statistik Austria

ASEP

SSÖ-ISSP

GGP

COVID-19 Pandemic

Teaching and Learning

GfK Austria

RECONNECT

Survey Methods: Insights from the Field

Featured Dataverses

In order to use this feature you must have at least one published or linked dataverse.

Publish Dataverse

Are you sure you want to publish your dataverse? Once you do so it must remain published.

Publish Dataverse

This dataverse cannot be published because the dataverse it is in has not been published.

Delete Dataverse

Are you sure you want to delete your dataverse? You cannot undelete this dataverse.

5,891 to 5,900 of 5,998 Results

Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions? Dec 12, 2018 - Public Keusch, Florian; Yan, Ting, 2018, "Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions?", https://doi.org/10.11587/Z1Z34H, AUSSDA, V1, UNF:6:WeNhLscKTnihphneSuN+vw== [fileUNF] Rating scales are used extensively in surveys. A rating scale can descend from the highest to the lowest point or from the positive to the negative pole. A rating scale can also start with the lowest point (or the negative pole) and ascend to the highest point (or the positive pole). Previous research has shown that the direction of the scale, i.e....
10026_co_en_1_0.pdf Dec 12, 2018 - Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions? Adobe PDF - 141.4 KB - MD5: dec53d30bce666077a2e5687b23d33f1 CodebookDocumentation Codebook
10026_da_en_v1_0.tab Dec 12, 2018 - Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions? Tabular Data - 81.1 KB - 62 Variables, 502 Observations - UNF:6:WeNhLscKTnihphneSuN+vw== Data Core data file - 62 Variables, 502 Observations
10026_qu_de_v1_0.pdf Dec 12, 2018 - Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions? Adobe PDF - 150.2 KB - MD5: 5f1ebff34bddeca4b79cbd72a1d7b423 DocumentationQuestionnaire Questionnaire - German
10026_qu_en_v1_0.pdf Dec 12, 2018 - Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions? Adobe PDF - 150.1 KB - MD5: b2c99bd46e26c12cc526698c137243e4 DocumentationQuestionnaire Questionnaire - English
10026_sx_en_1_0.R Dec 12, 2018 - Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions? Plain Text - 16.7 KB - MD5: 5a3818ef47aaf831d6fe4286a01b21f0 Code R scirpt for replication
AUTNES Multi-Mode Panel Study 2017 (SUF edition) Oct 24, 2018 - AUTNES Kritzinger, Sylvia; Aichholzer, Julian; Büttner, Nico; Eberl, Jakob-Moritz; Meyer, Thomas M.; Plescia, Carolina; Wagner, Markus; Morisi, Davide; Boomgaarden, Hajo; Müller, Wolfgang C., 2018, "AUTNES Multi-Mode Panel Study 2017 (SUF edition)", https://doi.org/10.11587/NXDDPE, AUSSDA, V2, UNF:6:G8QobLdA/xYZ6XpwsdUgVQ== [fileUNF] Full edition for scientific use. The AUTNES Multi-Mode Panel Study 2017 is a three-wave panel that focuses on the Austrian National Parliamentary Election held on 15 October 2017. This survey is part of the Austrian National Election Study (AUTNES).
10025_mr_en_v1_1.pdf Oct 24, 2018 - AUTNES Multi-Mode Panel Study 2017 (SUF edition) Adobe PDF - 540.8 KB - MD5: 36062db98ba284d61292eca7ea48efbc DocumentationMethod report Method report (errata v1_1: fixed formatting issues)
10030_da_de_v1_0.tab Oct 16, 2018 - Tertiary Education Opportunities for Refugees: MORE - Experiences and Insights (OA edition) Tabular Data - 29.5 KB - 91 Variables, 124 Observations - UNF:6:lDn90Cl8thB5qgWRvJhm0w== Data 91 Variables, 124 Observations
10030_da_de_v1_0.zsav Oct 16, 2018 - Tertiary Education Opportunities for Refugees: MORE - Experiences and Insights (OA edition) Unknown - 33.4 KB - MD5: d41efcd6af9e174b08bf5a51b65055c4 DataSPSS Core data file - compressed SPSS format - 91 Variables, 124 Observations

Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions?

Dec 12, 2018 - Public

Keusch, Florian; Yan, Ting, 2018, "Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions?", https://doi.org/10.11587/Z1Z34H, AUSSDA, V1, UNF:6:WeNhLscKTnihphneSuN+vw== [fileUNF]

Rating scales are used extensively in surveys. A rating scale can descend from the highest to the lowest point or from the positive to the negative pole. A rating scale can also start with the lowest point (or the negative pole) and ascend to the highest point (or the positive pole). Previous research has shown that the direction of the scale, i.e....

10026_co_en_1_0.pdf

Dec 12, 2018 - Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions?

Adobe PDF - 141.4 KB -

CodebookDocumentation

Codebook

10026_da_en_v1_0.tab

Dec 12, 2018 - Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions?

Tabular Data - 81.1 KB - 62 Variables, 502 Observations -

Data

Core data file - 62 Variables, 502 Observations

10026_qu_de_v1_0.pdf

Dec 12, 2018 - Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions?

Adobe PDF - 150.2 KB -

DocumentationQuestionnaire

Questionnaire - German

10026_qu_en_v1_0.pdf

Dec 12, 2018 - Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions?

Adobe PDF - 150.1 KB -

DocumentationQuestionnaire

Questionnaire - English

10026_sx_en_1_0.R

Dec 12, 2018 - Replication Data for: Is satisficing responsible for response order effects in rating scale questions?

Plain Text - 16.7 KB -

Code

R scirpt for replication

AUTNES Multi-Mode Panel Study 2017 (SUF edition)

Oct 24, 2018 - AUTNES

Kritzinger, Sylvia; Aichholzer, Julian; Büttner, Nico; Eberl, Jakob-Moritz; Meyer, Thomas M.; Plescia, Carolina; Wagner, Markus; Morisi, Davide; Boomgaarden, Hajo; Müller, Wolfgang C., 2018, "AUTNES Multi-Mode Panel Study 2017 (SUF edition)", https://doi.org/10.11587/NXDDPE, AUSSDA, V2, UNF:6:G8QobLdA/xYZ6XpwsdUgVQ== [fileUNF]

Full edition for scientific use. The AUTNES Multi-Mode Panel Study 2017 is a three-wave panel that focuses on the Austrian National Parliamentary Election held on 15 October 2017. This survey is part of the Austrian National Election Study (AUTNES).

10025_mr_en_v1_1.pdf

Oct 24, 2018 - AUTNES Multi-Mode Panel Study 2017 (SUF edition)

Adobe PDF - 540.8 KB -

DocumentationMethod report

Method report (errata v1_1: fixed formatting issues)

10030_da_de_v1_0.tab

Oct 16, 2018 - Tertiary Education Opportunities for Refugees: MORE - Experiences and Insights (OA edition)

Tabular Data - 29.5 KB - 91 Variables, 124 Observations -

Data

91 Variables, 124 Observations

10030_da_de_v1_0.zsav

Oct 16, 2018 - Tertiary Education Opportunities for Refugees: MORE - Experiences and Insights (OA edition)

Unknown - 33.4 KB -

DataSPSS

Core data file - compressed SPSS format - 91 Variables, 124 Observations

Add Data

Share Dataverse

Link Dataverse

Reset Modifications